If you are holding on to prohibited drugs temporarily for someone else with the intention of returning it to the owner of the drugs, you may not be criminally liable for supplying prohibited drugs.
Alternatively, it may be the case that ‘some’ of the prohibited drugs in your possession were being temporarily held for someone else, while you had the intention of supplying the remainder of the prohibited drugs for someone else.
In this case, you may still be charged for supplying a prohibited drug, but for a lower amount than you were initially charged with.
This is known as the ‘Carey defence’, which is named after the case of R v Carey (1990) 20 NSWLR 292.
The Carey defence is a legal defence strategy that can be used in cases where a person is charged with supplying a prohibited drug.
It is based on the principle that a person who is in temporary possession of drugs for another person should not be held criminally responsible for supply if they can prove that they did not intend to use or sell the drugs themselves.
The importance of this defence is that it may result in you being found not guilty of supplying a prohibited drug or, alternatively, not guilty of supplying a large commercial quantity of prohibited drugs but guilty of a lesser offence with a lower quantity and lower penalties.